Svanik Sharma's Website

Measure Theoretic Probability Part 1

June 7, 2026

I've recently been reading Billingsley's Probability and Measure Theory. I wanted to write down some notes I've been taking. In a separate post I'll also include my solutions to some of the chapters since the book doesn't provide complete solutions for all problems. This will likely be a series. This will contain notes for Chapter 2 and solutions to some of the problems. In general, for each article, I'll provide both notes and solutions and update them as I read further into the section and/or complete more problems. As a side note, since I'm trying to summarize important facts, I will not always include proofs for everything (though this might change as I update an article). I'll try to include updates/edits at the top of the article.

Probability Measures and Fields

A probability triple is a tuple (Ω,F,P)(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P) where Ω\Omega is a set, F\mathcal{F} is a field, and PP is a set function from F\mathcal{F} into R\mathbb{R}. A field F\mathcal{F} is a collection (or "class") of sets that satisfies the following:

  1. ΩF\Omega \in \mathcal{F}
  2. If AFA \in \mathcal{F}, then AcFA^c \in \mathcal{F}
  3. Let A1,A2,...,ANFA_1, A_2, ..., A_N \in \mathcal{F} be a finite collection of sets. Then, n=1NAnF\bigcup_{n=1}^N A_n \in \mathcal{F}.

The set function PP is a probability measure that satisfies the following:

  1. 0P(A)10 \le P(A) \le 1 for AFA \in \mathcal{F}
  2. P()=0P(\emptyset) = 0, P(Ω)=1P(\Omega) = 1
  3. If A1,A2,...,etcA_1, A_2, ..., \text{etc} is a disjoint sequence of F\mathcal{F}-sets and if k=1NAk\bigcup_{k=1}^N A_k, then P(k=1Ak)=k=1P(Ak)P(\cup_{k=1}^\infty A_k) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty P(A_k). That is, PP is countably additive.

This necessarily implies that PP is finitely additive as well, since we can take the first NN sets as A1,...,ANA_1, ..., A_N, and then let Ak=A_k = \emptyset for k>Nk > N.

σ-Fields

A σ\sigma -field is a field that satisfies the following conditions:

  1. ΩF\Omega \in \mathcal{F}
  2. If AFA \in \mathcal{F}, then AcFA^c \in \mathcal{F}.
  3. Let {An}n=1\{A_n\}_{n=1}^\infty is a sequence of F\mathcal{F}-sets. Then, n=1AnF\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n \in \mathcal{F}

In other words, the primary difference between a σ\sigma -field and an ordinary field is that a σ\sigma -field is closed under countable unions whereas ordinary fields are only closed under finite unions.

Let A\mathcal{A} be a class of subsets of Ω\Omega. Then, the σ\sigma -field generated by A\mathcal{A}, denoted σ(A)\sigma(\mathcal{A}), is the intersection of all σ\sigma fields that contain A\mathcal{A}. We have the two following facts:

  1. σ(A)\sigma(\mathcal{A}) is a σ\sigma -field.
  2. Let AG\mathcal{A} \subset \mathcal{G}, where G\mathcal{G} is a σ\sigma -field. Then, σ(A)G\sigma(\mathcal{A}) \subset \mathcal{G}.

Important Properties of Probability Measure

  1. Countable Subadditivity: If {An}n=1\{A_n\}_{n=1}^\infty is a sequence of F\mathcal{F} -sets and k=1AkF\cup_{k=1}^\infty A_k \in \mathcal{F} , then P(k=1Ak)k=1P(Ak)P(\cup_{k=1}^\infty A_k) \le \sum_{k=1}^\infty P(A_k).
  2. The Lebesgue measure λ\lambda is a countably additive probability measure on the field B0\mathcal{B}_0. Here, the field B0\mathcal{B}_0 is the field consisting of finite disjoint unions of subintervals of (0,1]=Ω(0, 1] = \Omega. If AB0A \in \mathcal{B}_0, then we can write A=n=1NInA = \cup_{n=1}^N I_n where the InI_n are pairwise disjoint intervals in (0,1](0, 1]. Then, λ(A):=n=1Nλ(In)=n=1NIn\lambda(A) := \sum_{n=1}^N \lambda(I_n) = \sum_{n=1}^N |I_n|.